So now this is more confusing to me, using that math. I'll use the RAMS for example, since that is current.
So in this basic example, these odds are extreme, but it is the Raiders we're talking about....
Raiders +30 (100 to 110)
Rams -30 (110 to 100)
Let's say somebody places a wager of $50 on the Raiders, with those outcomes, and the Raiders win the game, (for example).
The member would get (50 * 100) / 110 or $45 profit, and their stake ($50) returned. Is that right?
If they wagered $100 on the Raiders, they'd get $90 in profit, and their stake ($100) returned.
So, let's say if the Rams won the game, and scored 52 points on the Raiders, which they did, sorry.
If you wagered $50 on the Rams, you'd get $55 profit, plus your stake back.
If you wagered $50 on the Raiders, you'd lose your stake.
I guess my point is that I don't know why you'd have 100 to 110 odds or 110 to 100 odds on spread bets, because the spread bet makes it even odds, pretty much, right?
Wouldn't they normally be 100 to 100 odds on those spread bets? Or am I missing something.
I'm not worried about the bookie getting the juice or anything. I'm trying to figure out why, for spread bets, you'd have uneven odds.