/ Register

  1. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS:

    Your username here MUST MATCH your XenForo username (connected to your XF license).

    Once you have registered here, then you need to start a conversation at xenforo.com w/Bob and provide the following:
    1. Your XenForo License Validation Token
    2. The Domain Name associated with the License
    NOTE: Your account will be validated once ALL requirements are verified/met. Thank you for your patience.

Updated Google Search Console: Review-aggregate problem

Discussion in 'Showcase Resolved Bug Reports' started by fatih, Aug 31, 2015.

Tags:
  1. Aug 31, 2015 #1
    fatih

    fatih Member SC Premium

    Hi there,

    I'm sorry if the thread already created by anyone but there is a problem on Google Search Console page. If you look that, probably you will see this issue Structured Data area of Google Search Console like this:

    google-search-console-issue.png

    Template name:
    nflj_showcase_item_sidebar

    Code:
    Code:
    <div class="section statsList" id="showcaseInfo" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate">
    Sources and tests:
    -http://www.data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate/
    -https://developers.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/

    Regards,
     
  2. Aug 31, 2015 #2
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    What exactly IS the problem? You posted a bunch of stuff and never posted what the PROBLEM IS.
     
  3. Aug 31, 2015 #3
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    If you are asking about THIS, then this has been known for several years now and is an issue with the XenForo Resource Manager as well. Showcase uses the same exact code as the RM (for standardization purposes).

    Selection_661.png
     
    fatih likes this.
  4. Aug 31, 2015 #4
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    Its also the same exact issue with XenForo Media Gallery (as it too uses the same exact standardized code from the RM).

    Selection_662.png
     
    fatih likes this.
  5. Sep 1, 2015 #5
    fatih

    fatih Member SC Premium

    Yes I see... Then it's not a bug sorry Bob thank you for support. But I have a question why this has been known for several years and still haven't solved yet? Interesting :)
     
  6. Sep 1, 2015 #6
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    Im not sure. Maybe its because its more of a warning type thing than it is a real error. Google does that a lot (say things are "errors' when they really are not "ERRORS" as we know it.
     
    fatih likes this.
  7. Nov 18, 2015 #7
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    In webmaster tools... I've noticed that items that have no reviews get errors:

    Screenshot 2015-11-18 at 5.03.34 PM.png

    And items with reviews don't get the errors.

    Is there a way to fix this in the code to not give the error? I don't think not having a review would give an error - maybe it expects a "zero stars" or "no reviews have been submitted" to be where the review would normally be?

    This is what you get when you click on the "!"

    Screenshot 2015-11-18 at 5.05.44 PM.png

    That page is here:

    http://www.filmschool.org/filmschools/san-francisco-state-university-school-of-cinema.23/

    With their testing tool I get this:

    Screenshot 2015-11-18 at 5.07.25 PM.png

    And this:

    Screenshot 2015-11-18 at 5.08.02 PM.png

    Hopefully there's a way to fix how the items are displayed so these errors don't come up.

    Structured data is HUGE in the search results.
     
  8. Nov 18, 2015 #8
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    Also not sure why the title in the breadcrumb is giving an error.. that's strange..
     
  9. Nov 19, 2015 #9
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    Huh... so it's an XF thing. Hopefully they'll solve that nut. Maybe I'll post on there.
     
  10. Nov 19, 2015 #10
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    Although on my other site with an install of XFMG... it doesn't get any errors:

    Screenshot 2015-11-18 at 9.16.58 PM.png
     
  11. Nov 19, 2015 #11
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    I don't think its necessarily an "XF" thing, however, you can see by the above images, that the URLs were taken directly from xenforo.com in the RM and XFMG.

    I just ran a quick check with googles validation tools (Structured Data Testing Tool) and its still happening on XenForo.com with both the RM and XFMG

    https://xenforo.com/community/media/me.49/
    Selection_248.png


    https://xenforo.com/community/resources/cta-featured-threads-portal.2599/
    Selection_249.png
     
  12. Nov 19, 2015 #12
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

  13. Nov 19, 2015 #13
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    Huh... has someone let them know about it? I did a search for Structured Data on their site and nothing came up.
     
  14. Nov 19, 2015 #14
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    Im sure it has been brought up with as many people that use both the RM and XFMG. I used to do showcase a bit different (based on the way Digital Point does his), but changed over to using the Core XenForo rating template for standardization purposes.
     
  15. Feb 24, 2016 #15
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    Core XenForo just made an adjustment to this (in both the Resource Manager and Media Gallery), so I've applied those same changes to Showcase (SC 2.6.0 Beta 1).
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2016
    alfa1, fatih and cdub like this.
  16. Feb 24, 2016 #16
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    Awesome. I'm still seeing 2.5.4 in the download area for me which appears to be the version I'm running. I'm assuming these changes are for the next version whenever that comes out? Just making sure I'm not missing the correct download link for some reason.

    Hope all is well.
     
  17. Feb 24, 2016 #17
    Bob

    Bob Developer Staff Member

    Changes are with SC 2.6.0 Beta 1. When I am feeling better, I'll post a quick fix that you can apply until the next release.
     
  18. Feb 24, 2016 #18
    cdub

    cdub Member AMS Premium CAS Premium EMS Early Adopter IMS Premium LD Premium RMS Premium SC Premium UBS Premium

    No worries... I can wait until next release. You don't have the flu too do you? It's going around like crazy here.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...